Watu Credit Employees Raise Red Flags Over Alleged Nepotism in the Redundancy Process.
As layoffs become more common, the ethics of companies like Watu Credit will continue to be questioned, especially when they seem to prioritize profits over employee welfare.
A concerned employee at the firm has raised alarming issues about the redundancy process, suggesting it favours nepotism and corruption rather than equitable treatment for all staff.
How can Watu Credit justify these practices while claiming to comply with legal standards?
“Hi Cyprian. I’m a big fan of your work. I’ve seen your posts on the failing economy, and it’s true that many businesses are struggling with redundancies on the rise. They prefer to call it ‘rightsizing’ these days.”
“At Watu Credit, where I currently work, I want to voice serious concerns about the handling of the redundancy process.
“Despite management’s claims of adhering to the redundancy process’s rules and legal terms, it’s evident that certain ‘Heads of Departments’ have already compiled a predetermined list of employees for termination.
“Many of these individuals lack the proper qualifications and legitimate credentials. I worry that those of us who don’t receive preference will face a disadvantage, as their perceived “reliability” will determine who remains and who departs.”
